This post is part of a three-part series on the grievous deficiencies of Wikipedia administrators.
I’ve been complaining recently about how much I hate Wikipedia’s administrators. When I wrote my first blog post here about why I really hate these admins, all comments I got were against me. Well it turns out that all these comments were made by administrators trying to defend themselves. Guess what, admins? Other people hate you too. Here’s a blog post I found that highlights some of the fallacies of administrators on Wikipedia:
This post first appeared on thewebservice.co.uk under the title “The Problem with Wikipedia”, and was written by mrwebservice. It has been edited by Deathgleaner for use on this blog.
Wikipedia sucks.
Why do I say this? Obviously I’ve just had yet another bad experience with the self-professed Gods who “manage” the encyclopaedia… but is this a case of sour grapes or evidence of a fundamental problem? One or even a few incidents and you get a little irritated, but a bizarre attitude seems to be endemic to Wiki’s mods. So let’s take a look at just why Wikipedia sucks quite so badly.
Who wants to be a Wikipedia moderator? Why would you want to do it? How would you find the time? Why would you be bothered? Here are the reasons:
- You want to contribute something of value to the human race: knowledge. A noble thought. But why not just contribute in the normal way? Because you are a prolific contributor and want to feel a little important.
- You have a burning hatred of “spammers” and pranksters who leave their trail of junk contributions and links wherever they go. You fight the good fight and think of yourself as a crusader against spam. And you have the badges on your profile page to prove it.
- You have acres of spare time and don’t know what to do with it. You may be old or unemployed and debating on forums does not carry the import or weight of helping to manage the most used encyclopaedia in the world.
- You have a personal agenda to follow and you need the power to carry it through. Knowledge is power and you have the keys.
Now, let’s take a pinch of all these attributes and mix them together. What do we end up with? I’ll tell you what. A trumped-up & twisted little troll so filled with their own self-importance they are about to explode.
The two breeds of Wikipedia Moderators
In general, though, there are two types of Wikipedia moderator.
Wikipedia Moderator #1: the instigator with a vested interest
This is maybe the most dangerous breed. They have established a small reputation and perhaps following on Wikipedia through their collection of at best pedestrian and at worst moronic contributions. For whatever reason they have staked out a claim on a small patch of Wikipedia and see it as “theirs”. They were there first. Their material should stay. They’ve seen off countless spammers and weak revisions and are invincible.
These moderators will pounce on any revisions you make and systematically delete them. They may even try and delete whole articles you’ve written.
Wikipedia Moderator #2: the spam-hater with the itchy mouse finger
Although the instigators are pretty depressing, I think it’s actually these people that are the worst. These moderators cycle through the whole of Wikipedia looking for things to delete. Because they spend their time cycling through all the articles nominated for deletion, they don’t really have any specialism (other than being a tenacious “crusader”, with “left-wing” views so potent they actually make Hitler look like a hobbyist)
These jumped-up jobsworths who were misinformed about their lineage can’t comprehend what they’re reading 99% of the time and are happy to just keep clicking away. Delete-delete-delete. They’re doing everyone a service, after all. Where would Wikipedia be without them? It would be a seething link farm filled with “original research” and garbage. Every time something is deleted, the moderator has brought some good back to the world. The criterion for deletion is simple: if it’s been nominated, rip it out.
Why the two breeds are bad for anyone with anything to say
These two types of moderator work together. Step one: the instigator with the vested interest notices you and starts causing problems. Once the instigator has nominated something for deletion, or you’ve got into an argument with him about something that’s already been deleted, like some evil genie in a bottle, the spam-hater with the itchy trigger finger pops up. If something’s been nominated for deletion, “click” goes the spam-hater, and it’s gone. They don’t think twice. They are crusaders, after all.
You can’t Complain about Wikipedia Moderators
Wikipedia is “not a democracy” and there’s no higher order to complain to when things go wrong – just a seething collective of no-hopers who have formed alliances and like nothing more than slapping these laughable phallic symbols all over the place:
That’s right. You want to play by the rules and you’ve done your research. Your revisions are accurate and you have the links to prove it; your article was neutral and you want to argue your case; you’ve done your research and you actually followed Wikipedia policy. The trouble is, all of these policies are open to considerable interpretation, and there are so many rules and guidelines that there will always be something to throw at you. Remember, it’s not about debate. The decision has been made.
Wikipedia is essentially the biggest committee in the world.
Wikipedia is a big committee. And committees are crap. Everyone knows that. There are 1,614 admins on the English Wikipedia at the time of writing which is both a massive amount of people to be generating red tape and also a bizarrely minuscule number of people when you consider the millions of pages Wikipedia contains. So we’re really talking about the cream: the most mean-spirited, petty people on the planet.
Let’s hunt down and destroy Wikipedia moderators
I would like to hear of anyone and everyone’s bad experiences of Wikipedia. Perhaps we should all band together and form our own collective of Anti-Wikipedians. Any Wikipedia moderators with an axe to grind can go elsewhere. I have a rigid set of rules and guidelines in place and what that boils down to is I don’t like Wikipedians and I will delete your comment and glue my own banners all over your smug, self-regarding faces.
— END RE-BLOG —
This post received many comments which cursed administrators. Here are just a few:
They don’t give you reasons for deleting your content until you complain to them, and then it’s usually some lame excuse, then if you do exactly what they say, THEY STILL DELETE YOUR CONTENT. I hate Wikipedia and I think it should burn.
So true, Wikipedia is full of Nazi’s that’s why I quit. Most of the vandalism is done by so called admins them selves, I post an article and they delete it (vandalism) saying we don’t feel we need that. So if I write an article about something video games related a person who doesn’t know anything about video games or the internet deletes it?
As a former Wikipedia contributor with 2K+ edits and 50+ created articles, I couldn’t agree more with what you said! Looking back, the idea is fatally flawed.
I tried to put up a photo which i took myself and it was deleted using ‘copyrighted’ as a excuse. Copyrighted..? My own image..? That doesn’t make sense. I even tried to edit one article by inserting only one sentence using ‘credible’ sources and yet what happens: deleted. I was surprised by how quickly deletions take place. This one was only a matter of minutes. Those people must stay glued to their screens 24/7 looking to see if anyone has added anything so it can be deleted.
The criteria for using Wikipedia totally sucks. You have to do this; you have to do that; and, when you comply – there is another rule to follow.
If one of their people writes an article about YOU or your business, THEY get exclusive right to control the content. They also have a ‘blocking’ policy that prevents you from contributing if you threaten them with legal action. So, basically, they can totally misrepresent your source of income, possibly causing a loss of business, and then lock you out from complaining about it.
I had a run in with some today, it seems that they don’t have to follow rules or guidelines, can make up their own rules on the spot and ban people who are trying to stop vandals (or for any other reason they like). i have been trying to stop vandals and have been banned for a day because of it…the way the admins act completely defeats the point of having rules and guidelines to follow.
WIKI[PEDIA] is entertainment for losers without a job. It’s not an open community, in fact, anything you add gets deleted or reverted by some looser admin who thinks it only goes his way.
Wikipedia began a rapid toboggan slide down a very slippery slope with the advent of moderation. It is ironic that moderators, putatively introduced to remove the bias (in addition to misinformation, poorly written content and spam) from Wikipedia, have instead replaced user-contributed bias with their own, moderator-contributed brand of heavy-handed chauvinism, pettiness and personal agendas.
Exactly, administrators. It’s not just me, it’s all the regular users. Administrators, you have bashed us non-admins enough. You think you know everything. You think you’re perfect. You think the world revolves around you. You think of all this bullsh*t that’s not true, and when a regular user makes ONE TINY EDIT you just have to throw a bunch of stones at that user and mess with him/her, don’t you? So follow the rules like everyone else does and quit being retards, you administrators.
Look The Abominable Dr. Lenny on NoHomers.net, I’m more of an adult then you, your literally acting like a little kid. All those things you said towards me here:https://nohomers.net/forums/index.php?threads/the-deal-with-admins.44257/#post-1202242 is something what a kid would say, what are you 12 years old? Grow up, why do you have so much hate over a person you don’t even know… 🙄
Besides, all thanks to your selfish and childish behavior how now made you leave the site, when I heard the news that you left, it put a huge smile on my face, lol. Since you laughed at me, who’s laughing now! 😆😆
Here’s an example of Abominable Dr. Lenny’s attitude towards me, he responded:
“Turn my back on you? Were we in some kind of relationship? Why did you trust me? What did you trust me with? You mean when you kept sending me weird PM’s, the latest of which I didn’t respond to? You’re such an unpleasant. What are you even doing here? Whining about minute and unimportant arguments you’ve had on an internet forum as if it’s the end of the world is a very clear sign that you are indeed the one that needs to grow up. I’m starting to think you might be a literal child. Nobody but a child could be this obnoxious in begging for pity and attention.”
It looks like your the needs to grow up Lenny, what are you 12 years old? This reply is something that a 12 year old would act like. I’m more of an adult then you Lenny, no wonder the admins refuse to block you on that site, because you enjoy kissing up to the admins, they allow you to act like a little kid on NoHomers.net. Seriously, who do you have so much hate over a person you don’t even know? Besides, all thanks your selfish and sarcasm childish behavior have now lead you to leave the site. I’ve reed on the NoHomer Club Wiki that said people were talking about you and you had left the site because of that, which put a huge smile on my face, Hahahaha! Who’s laughing now The Abominable Dr. Lenny. Not you! 😆😆😆
This absolutely made my day when he left! 🙂
Look admin The Goode Family on NoHomers.net, you don’t know sh** what happened! What gives you the right to defend an admin that constantly swears in his posts all the time. When you write to he here:https://nohomers.net/forums/index.php?threads/the-deal-with-admins.44257/#post-1202242
“lol he’s obviously in the right. he warned you in february not to fiddle with the page again and you completely ignored him. what did you expect to happen? editing a page to do the same thing a zillion times because you can’t make up your mind is disruptive. by the power of buckimion i banish you from editing any wikia ever again.”
Yeah, you think this is a big f***ing joke to you, but it’s not. First off, yes, I made a mistake, but I didn’t do it on purpose, it was an accident. I’m not gonna let you sit there and think cyberbullying is a complete joke to you, your just as bad as user The Abominable Dr. Lenny. So why don’t you tell me that again without the disrespectful sarcasm attitude you Republican b***h! 😡🖕🏻
This exactly the reason why I don’t wanna have anything to do with politics, people use politics to be disrespectful to people abd even online too. Again, that’s why the internet isn’t as great as it use to be, people like you are so disrespectful because of this. I keep my opinions to myself and you people should keep your opinions to yourselves. Think about that, ok. Because I wasn’t brought up like that to be a jerk to people, because it’s wrong. You people are the reason why my anxiety was getting worse, but now that I’m better and brace now, I am not gonna let your disrespectful attitudes get the better of me. Even though you guys think cyberbullying is a joke, then that makes you look bad, because you don’t care about other people but yourselves. End of story.
NinjaRobotPirate and ferret, you two are the most dumbest users I have ever seen, what you both said here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NinjaRobotPirate#Sweep? is without a doubt the stupidest proof you ever made, I said I’m not the same person that made that other uploading pictures account username. Seriously, I can’t have any peace and quiet on the internet without getting harassed by jerk face admins. Seriously, LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!
Look 151.74.119.128, I was only following the policy. The reason why I originally requested for the Carlo Bonomi article to be deleted is because there wasn’t any evidence on the internet to confirm if he really passed away or not, in September 2019. After what you said about me here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Carlo_Bonomi, saying that my rationale was pointless and wrong on so many levels. Of course I know he’s a notable voice actor on Pingu, that was a mistake made before, quit being a disrespectful jerk and stop your b****ing! Ok, nobody ask you to be a jerk about it. Besides, makes those sarcasm kind of posts is again the policy.
This exactly the reason why the internet isn’t that great anymore today, everyone out there online are so extremely negative. Because no rush me never takes there time online to think to themselves “Is this post really worth our time and day to get angry at this user for making this kinda edit deletion request on an article?”
Because seriously, I can’t have any peace and quiet on the internet without getting harassed by users who don’t even know me. Come on people, grow up! 🙄
This exactly the reason why the internet isn’t that great anymore today, everyone out there online are so extremely negative. Because no one out there on the internet never takes there time online to think to themselves “Is this post really worth our time and day to get angry at this user for making this kinda edit deletion request on an article?”
Because seriously, I can’t have any peace and quiet on the internet without getting harassed by users who don’t even know me. Come on people, grow up! 🙄
There’s also this user named Facu-el Millo, who literally makes a big deal out of every edit a user makes on the Harry Potter film articles. Just recently I was adding some info on the Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone (film) article on Joe Sowerbutts voice dubbing in some lines as Harry when Radcliffe’s voice was breaking, additional I was also adding info about Warner Bros. denying this clam. But Facu-el Millo unnecessary stated that the sources I used “The Sun” and “The Guardian” were not reliable enough to be used, but actually he’s wrong. Because I’ve seen several articles on there that user The Guardian as sources for some articles they published, he doesn’t know crap about reliable sources. Because I looked this up on the wiki policy and it says these sources can be used, so there. Besides, I’ve seen his talk page and he received so many complaints from several users and ip users over all the reverted edits he did to them.
Ok guys, let me ask you this. When you edit an actor/actress article, is it really worth necessary to protect the article over an stupid occupation? Well apparently admin Ohnoitsjamie thinks it’s worth it to protect an actor/actress article over a stupid occupation… because I was editing the Quinton Flynn article over his occupation section, explaining that he did comedy on the Jimmy kimmel live show, but unfortunately he deletes it and protects the article for a week… yes… over a completely stupid reason! I mean come on Wikipedia, is this really worth your time and day to protect an article over a stupid occupation edit on an actor/actress article? I know I wouldn’t… 🙄
I’ve been check back on the site recently since I no longer touch an article anymore. And I’m still surprised that user:Homechallange55 is still being crazy as always, I’m also still surprised they haven’t ban him yet, ever after why he treated me. Harassing me and telling me I have “quote” on “quote” mental illness, it was all because I asked him to stop threatening and deleting contain from various articles and still receives so much support, especially from Sro23 who awarded him and told him that he’s doing the right thing and saying I’m a bad user, just wow. I know it’s been two years since I talked about those too, but they still can’t be trusted. Both Homechallange55 and Sro23 are a bunch of psychopathical liars, especially Homechallange55. Making up stuff about a user/person they don’t even know and say they have issues and this and that about them is just bad (just like what he said to me), seriously he needs to control his anger. He’s a psychopathical liar.
“checking” I meant, not “check”
P.S. Ebyabe is also a psychopathical lair!
Now we have this obnoxious user named AJFU, who is now deleting information from the Mike MacRae and Buzz Lightyear article. Claiming it’s “quote” on “quote” unsourced, which it’s isn’t to begin with. No all roles in various actor/actress articles don’t need to be all sourced in order to keep them in there, AJFU is just doing it just to revert it back again when ever a user tried to edit it in back in the article. Still, Mike MacRae voices Buzz and that’s that. If AJFU wants proof, he can ask anyone out there, he even added this tag in the “Voiced by” section in the infobox of the Buzz Lightyear article saying: “” which instead there “IS” 100% proof, he just st added that in there just so he doesn’t want anyone to added it back in there again. But it doesn’t, people can add it back in there as many times they want. If he can’t accept the info, that’s his problem. Because MecRae did the voice, period.
This is what it said: “No evidence that Mike MacRae provides the voice of Buzz in video games. See talk page”
P.S. Ok, I know that I used the word “obnoxious” when I talked about him, I kinda went a lot too far with that and I kinda made it sound a little to harsh. I admit it now, I just don’t like seeing information get deleted after all those years being on there, were it directly says the roles he does according to IMDb.
Ok now do u know what’s getting annoying now, on the Tim Allen article. I’ve been trying to move his arrests info into it’s own subsection of the article, but somehow the annoying admins are reverting it back and fourth and saying it’s not “quote” on “quote” appropriate. I mean are they serious!?!?!? His arrest info has nothing to do with his career, it needs to be in it’s own subsection of the article. It goes to show everyone how crazy they are with IP users edits, even if you do the right thing, they say your still wrong with it.
User: John from Ideon replied “Gain consensus for your changes. a separate section is neither called for nor appropriate” I mean, really!?!?! Are they that serious…. Making a big deal over a section of info being moved with it’s own subsection. Bull****.
Wish User:STATicVapor would stop deleting info already, because he’s really being annoying.
User:FlightTime is by far far… the worst and craziest users that I’ve ever encountered. He will have an article protected and he will accuse you for vandalizing them all and will just have them protected for no reason. Even if you try to fix and error on an articls, he will revert your edits until you “quote” on “quote” explain it. And he does more besides that too.
The one thing that’s really annoying is that every ip and other users keeps vandalizing and removing Bill Hader’s comedy info, no matter how many times I restore it, another ip and user would delete and change his infobox all around without explaining themselves. That is now getting so irritating and frustrating now, so now I have to keep an eye on it so it won’t get messed up.
Anthony is right. They only protect themselves. Now User:STATicVapor is being annoying, keeps on deleting some Shad Gaspard’s info on the article and explaining this and that in the edit summaries, with no purpose what so ever. But however, it’s not a big darn deal! So why delete it! Go to show you that they don’t care about info. They just like to delete everything to anger people, because like Anthony said, they only protect themselves.
I also doesn’t matter how many times they keep deleting sourced info and saying it’s “quote” on “quote” unsourced info, it’s just gonna keep getting restored by us no matter what. Even if you try to provide enough sourced info and evidence to keep the info in the article, they will still keep on deleting it, even no matter how many times you try to show them proof.
Latin915 will especially revert an edit he won’t like what you made and will protect the article indefinite without giving u a dan reason on your talking page, he will accuse u of everything u didn’t do. Hope Latin gets fired from his adminship someday.
He will not take criticism either.
Latin915 is also the reason why so many users keep making sock puppet accounts to continue editing after he bans them, due to his unfair blocks. Even no matter how many times to try to correct or add some additional info in any of a wrestler article and other, he will “CLICK” revert and “CLICK” protects the article indefinite, as he always does. This is just gonna keep making him look bad, because he’s the most selfish user on the entire wiki.
This admin user named Latin915 on the Pro Wrestling wiki is now starting to annoy me even more. When ever I edit a single article of a wrestler, he keeps reminding me countless times about not coping and pasting info from Wikipedia to the articles, which I haven’t. I know that’s a rule on there, but he doesn’t have to keeping reminding me about it. Basically what happened, is that I was editing the Gene Snitsky article and I was adding info of his work on the Independent Circuit and his retirement from wrestling in 2018. I wrote it all in my own words and everything and “AGAIN” he told me not to copy and paste the info from Wikipedia, he even said it will be the last time he’s telling me about that, which “AGAIN” I didn’t do. Next time Latin915, instead of leaving me a warning message about the whole copy and paste stuff, you could at least look over it and read it first “BEFORE” leaving me a message about it, which would make things easier for me and you. Because I wrote it in my own words.
Well, I’m done with the site now. He just ban me for six months because he thought I was “quote” on “quote” harassing him. I was just only showing him proof that I didn’t copy and paste any info from Wikipedia, he’s the one that began to ignore me when I messaged him about it three times. Well, screw Latin915, just like the family guy wiki I’m no longer gonna participate on the pro wrestling wiki after six months has gone by. Latin915 should have never become admin in the first place, he makes so much unfair blocks without even messaging you about it, because he’s only protecting himself.
Update: Now I’ve been trying to apologize to him twice on the community wiki and he’s completely ignoring me now, he keeps deleting my message and saying in the delete thread “Issue resolved”. But I would like a yes or no answer from you, agreeing to unblock me or not, and a reply instead of ignoring me. So let me get this straight Latin915, I’ve seen other user apologize to u and I unblock them afterwards. So u can unblock other users when they apologize to u on the community wiki, but u won’t unblock me when I apologize to u??? No matter now many times I write to u??? That doesn’t make sense, I don’t owe u another apology anyone, your the one that should be apologizing to me, for your poor ignorance attitude. I was just being nice to u, ok. So f*** Latin915, some one needs to put him in his place, or remove his adminship.
Another read why Latin915 isn’t answering me is that because he’s ignoring me on purpose. He’s only doing that just to be a jerk.
Now he’s trying to report me all because I talked about him… what is wrong with this guy…
Update: Now I’ve been trying to apologize to him twice on the community wiki and he’s completely ignoring me now, he keeps deleting my message and saying in the delete thread “Issue resolved”. But I would like a yes or no answer from you, agreeing to unblock me or not, and a reply instead of ignoring me. So let me get this straight Latin915, I’ve seen other user apologize to u and u unblock them afterwards. So u can unblock other users when they apologize to u on the community wiki, but u won’t unblock me when I apologize to u??? No matter now many times I write to u??? Now u extended it to 30 freaking years!?!?! Are you serious Latin!?!?! All because of a talk page removal issue. That doesn’t make sense, I don’t owe u another apology anyone, your the one that should be apologizing to me, for your poor ignorance attitude. I was just being nice to u, ok. So f*** Latin915, some one needs to put him in his place, or remove his adminship.
Another problem with Latin915 is that he’s makes so much unfair blocks to users that did nothing wrong, he will ban you up to a 30 or 40 year time period, which is completely ridiculous. Someone needs to remove him from his adminship, he can’t be treating users like this, punishing them for a block to a 30 to 40 years time period is completely wrong and harassment too. An admins job is to help and care for users whenever they need it, and to help protect their wiki from vandals IP address users, not to harass us and treat us bad. Just because u because admin doesn’t mean u can treat people the way I want too, that’s not what an admin should do to us. Even if u try to respond to Latin915 for an unblock request you received for 30 or 40 years, he will just delete your message on the Community Wiki and will never even care what u say to him, no matter how many times u try to be nice to him. Still, his issues towards us needs to stop.
Great news, I’ve just found out that The1337gamer is finally retired from the wiki, since December 2018. All I can say is…. Thank Heavens!!!!!! I’ve been waiting for this day for him to leave.
Wikipedia Editors are also racist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_bias_on_Wikipedia
There is no doubt the majority of editors are white males, with their own biased agenda.
I have seen numerous instances where they refuse to listen to allow anyone to make edits regarding their own race/religiion/language and culture. They know better.
In the real world this behavior would not be acceptable, but online it is. I had an editor explaining topics in my own religion and language that was 100% wrong. But I was not allowed to make edits. The editor contacted his friends (other editors) and they reached a consensus that white people know better!
That’s why I no longer read anything on Wikipedia. Its’ racist and biased and there is no authority to correct this type of behavior.
I especially don’t even care if they keep on deleting important sources and info from articles, I’m just gonna keep reveritng it back and restoring it the way it was before, if they have a problem with me about it… than that’s their problem. Ssilvers especially has this “quote” on “quote” issue with infoboxes in various articles of actors, singer, comedians and others, he recently deleted the infobox on the Leslie Henson article that an ip user just recently made and he completely deleted it all, all the info of his death, spouses and everything! he added in “Per the ArbCom decision, please do not add an infobox to this article without first establishing a [[WP:CONSENSUS]] on the Talk page to add one.” I mean, seriously… how was that unnecessary? And against the “quote” on “quote” consensus? That’s kinda stupid. I think it is, becuase they never appreciate what ever you add in, when ever you try to improve an article a lot better.
Ssilvers has issues with infoboxs, I have no idea what his deal is with them….
IKR! That’s why I keep telling everyone that Wikipedia admins only protected themselves.
Now user:KevinHunter2011 did something that was really ridiculous and annoying over some edits I made on the International Wrestling Entertainment wiki. He reverted my edit in the Big Show article and its all because I changed his name from “Marc Randall Beltran Jr.” to his real name “Paul Donald Wight Jr.”, because I was only trying to stick with the source material of the wrestler’s real names when I edit them, he changes it back without “EXPLAINING” it to me on my talk page, even with the same thing on the Kevin Nash article. I was never vandalizing it, I was only trying to make it look good and how it should looks in some of the sections. When I was just about to add in his entrance themes in the article, all of a sudden “BOOM!” His protects it infinitely without explaining it to me in my talk page as well. I don’t get the deal, I was only sticking with the source material of all the wrestlers and he goes and changes them back without telling me about it. I even went to his talk page and asked him about it, on why he changed them back without telling me on my talk page. After I posted my message to him, he never responded. I mean… really.
Update: I messaged him again recently and he still hasn’t responded. Don’t know what his deal is.
Even though I apologized to Buckimion about before on the Family Guy Wiki, I still didn’t do anything wrong and he still managed to unban me on there. That’s another thing about Buckimion, he will not let you edit again until you “quote” on “quote” apologize to him. Although I did ask for a second chance on there after he unban me, I later then decided at the last minute that it’s just not worth it. It’s just not worth to edit the family guy wiki again, because he will just ban you again after you get unblocked. Plus, there’s no need for user:Tyetheblockhead to defend him for his actions again us, calling us “You know what” over his crazy editing, Buckimion is only protecting himself. Because he will not take criticism, if you look on his profile on his user page, it says he’s a disabled cop and such and such. He’s only saying that just to be a tough guy, he’s nothing but a liar. But there’s also some users just like Tyetheblockhead saying he’s “quote” on “quote” not that bad, “IF” you follow his wiki policy rules. But the truth is that you can’t get along with him, because he’s too crazy as an admin. But seriously, Buckimion needs a lot of help for him, because he shouldn’t keep treating users this way. Even TimUneeversie made a video on him here:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P-_uhtbAijw, but seriously Buckimion, you need help
I can name a huge list of Admins/users that I encounter in the past that protect themselves from harm. For example, Sro23 protects himself, Lord Sjones23 protects himself, Drmies protects himself, Ebyabe protects himself, JamesBWatson protects himself, 1337gamer protects himself, CityOfSilver protects himself, FlightTime protects himself, AndytheGrump protects himself, Bbbb23 protects himself, Ponyo protects himself, BeyondMyKen protects himself, and many more! Like I said before, I don’t even care if their mad at me for revealing the truth about them and the admins themselves. Because it’s to late for them to make excuses, they have are done the damage to me enough, That’s why I quit, I’ve been done with them for a long time already. They have gone too far for pushing us like this, enough is enough. Protecting themselves is all they do today.
P.S. Also, MarnetteD protects himself as well, another user I forgot to mention. But it’s ok, I’m not the only person that revealed the truth about them admins/users on there, “EVERYONE” on here in this thread has revealed the truth about an admin/user they encountered during their time on there, not just me. Who can’t blame them, leaving is the right thing to do, there’s no need for us to put up with jerk admins/users like those guys. That’s why we should stick with fan site wikis for now on.
He especially deletes everything! Whenever a user tries to update or adds additional info, “BOOM!” reverts it back and deletes it. Saying “rvt to last clean vesion.” everytime he reverts them, even if there fine the way they are he still never leaves them alone. And that my friends is also another reason why I completely stop editing, period.
Bbb23 blocks new editors daily. Break one rule? Bye-bye. The 10 lines! of “Admin accountability” policy requires them admins to explain the rules… well, that never happens. I’ve been onwiki for a few months, and learned a ton of the policies. Admins often act on their own terms, referring to non-existent rules, or abusing existing ones. Once I told Bbb he is not neutral, after he ignored the evidence of an editor editwarring me. Recently he just blocked me indef 22 hours after an editor-in-good-standing accused me of “bludgeoning”… That editor was in a heated debate with me on a Move review discussion: conflict-of-interest. Bbb ticked the box: disruptive edits. Evidence? Nada. As he was in a conflict with me, this is clear abuse of tools. Case already at ArbCom, the 9 “arbitrators” are not rushing to question him for his responsibilities as admin… one answer took days. I don’t expect them to do anything. Wikipedia is an oligarchy, governed by the “janitors”.
I can name a huge list of Admins/users that I encounter in the past that protect themselves from harm. For example, Sro23 protects himself, Lord Sjones23 protects himself, Drmies protects himself, Ebyabe protects himself, JamesBWatson protects himself, 1337gamer protects himself, CityOfSilver protects himself, FlightTime protects himself, AndytheGrump protects himself, Bbbb23 protects himself, Ponyo protects himself, BeyondMyKen protects himself, and many more! Like I said before, I don’t even care if their mad at me for relieving the truth about them and the admins themselves. Because it’s to late for them to make excuses, they have are done the damage to me enough, That’s why I quit, I’ve been done with them for a long time already. They have gone too far for pushing us like this, enough is enough. Protecting themselves is all they do today.
I Hate that user Bbb23 he blocked me for trolling when I wasn’t trolling plus he thinks that I have an identical behavior from another user I don’t he’s just an asshole
I’ve reed about his history on there, I had to deal with him before. Even though I’m no longer editing on there anymore since I stopped, I will say this before and I will say it again. They don’t protect their articles just from various IP addresses users and regular users whenever we try to fix informations and mistakes and stuff, they just only protect themselves. Especially from everyone, they disagree with everything you tell them. Whenever they revert an edit they don’t like what you made to the article, they always tell you to take it to the talk page and discuss the issue, I had to deal with all that many times before in the past. There was one time I had to take an edit issue to the take page all because of a stupid occupation issue a user was disagreeing with me with on an “Actor” article. And guess what, when I explained the issue to the talk page and explained why I removed it for a reason, I got a whole bunch of disagrees as always, but they don’t see that they were the ones making the big huge deal out of that small little edit I deleted. I mean come on… seriously??? All that nonsense over a tinny edit, come on people, grow up! So yep, that’s what I mean. They only protect themselves and no one else, even when you report someone for harassing you, they blame you for it. I felt with that before, been there, done that. I will tell the story here to you soon when I get a chance.
True enough. At the moment there is a huge problem with an administrator by the name of GiantSnowman. I do not know how to complain about him, but if someone knows, please let me know. Every time I make an attempt to correct a false piece of information, he reverts it. On his user page, he tells that “This user doesn’t like Nazis”, but he is a Wikipedia Nazi of the worst kind himself. Now there is plenty of incorrect information that I know of and I cannot correct it, probably because the Wikipedia Nazi does not like me.
Funny, I’m actually not all that surprised. That’s what WP is now these days, it’s alway’s full of disagreements by various admins over the information in their articles. Even every time when they revert an edit, they alway’s say in the edit summaries “Take it to the talk page” to talk about the issue. But in opinion, why bother doing that…. because it’s just gonna get a whole bunch of disagreements from several admins and they won’t even listen what you have to say about it, and your opinion of the issue too, I experienced that a lot, been there done that. There was one time I had an issue from a user on the Steve Carell article, named CityOfSilver. He is also considered in my opinion, one of the most annoying user I have ever came across on there. Anyways, I was editing his occupations and was removing the term “voice actor”, and I was trying to explain that he doesn’t do much voice over in his career and that another ip user was the one that added it in there, but all of a sudden he came across and revert my edit and told me to “EXPLAIN” it in the edit summaries and such and such. After I removed it and “Explained” it this time, he continues to revert it and he kept on being a wise mouth towards me too, calling me “Cheaky ” and so and so, this went on and on until he said take it to the talk page to talk about the issue, so I did. And guess how it happened, I got a whole bunch off nonsense disagreements about the edit issue and they decided to kept it in the article and have sources about it… I mean really…. a whole bunch of nonsense about a freaking occupation, for crying out loud. But still, I wasn’t all that surprised about it, I even face palmed myself. Also, there was also a time on the Charles Martinet article were The1337gamer kept on removing his “Filmography” of al the film, television and video games he worked on in her career, complaining that it needs to be sourced, all of them. Again, I took it to the talk page and guess what I got…. more disagreements, as usual. He even kept on saying threatening and harassing comments towards me a swell, calling me “Stupid and childish” and everything, so ya…. even I can’t believe he said all that, I also can’t even believe that they allow him to act like that towards users, usual you get ban for harassing and threatening users like that. But not him, he didn’t get ban. But I did stood up for myself against him and then Sro23 came in and stick his nose were it doesn’t belong and told him about me and my real username, don’t even get me started with Sro23, and especially Ebyabe too. If I did that, I will be here all day, taking about all the problems they gave me. That’s another thing, they will not take criticism from anyone when ever they harass and pick us apart for nothing, because even when they picked on me, the admins did “NOTHING!” and I mean, “NOTHING!” about it, they do nothing about their cyberbullying problems, period.
P.S. By the way, is you see some typos or missing words in one sentence, just ignore it.
And that’s another thing, you can never make them happy, no matter what u do. No matter how many times you try to help improve articles and others things, it will still not make them impressed or happy. Like I said before, it’s always full of disagreements.
Also Mike, one last thing I forgot to mention. What ever u do, “DO NOT!” I repeat “DO NOT!” join the Wikipediocracy site, I’m having some regrets now ever since I joined. Basically it’s a site were users can post threads about their experience on Wikipedia and other stuff about it too, but basically it’s a website telling people it’s ok to bully someone. What do I mean by that? It’s because there are a lot of users on their that can be jerks to you for no reason and stuff and will sometimes makes threats to you as well, “AndytheGrump” for example. Sometimes the admin on there are like that too, I only had one admin on there that was good to me and that was it. But just watch out for Andy (aka AndytheGrump) on there, he’s the worst, he use to be an editor on WP, but he’s now retired from the site. He always drops a lot of F bombs on there in various threads and other things, he even will blames us for causing the problems on WP in the threads on there when ever we will post a thread. So basically for the way he acts towards us, it kinda tells you he probably has some mental illness in him, because that’s probably the reason why he keeps threatening users and everything. Like me, he kept on threatening and blaming me for the problem in which I was just proving a point about the site, then another jerk user came in and defended him and told me to shut up and everything. Also, the way he looks at sources on WP, he will only accept sources that are reliable enough for him to accept it. Because I just recently reed a thread on their of a post about actor Joe Maggard someone mentioned on there about him, I can go on and on about what Andy says in it, but that will take me forever to write here. If you can find the link to the page, you will see what I’m talking about. And especially for someone to defend a bully like that, tells you that they are not in their right minds, thinking that bulling is ok, but it’s not. I just wish the internet was not like this now these days, people need to learn to grow up. Besides, screws the users and admins in there that were bad towards me, except for the ones that were good to me. But like I said, again “NEVER!” join that site, I’m telling you as a friend and for your safety.
Another problem is that I used my real name as my user name by accident, now they already know what my real name is. Also besides AndytheGrump, there’s also Ebyabe, who has been on of the worst towards me. I can’t even tell you how many times he stalked me and picked me apart many times in the past year. I will admit that I did write an angry message towards him on his talk page on the Wiki Commons site here:https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ebyabe about suing him and stuff, but later on, I tried to explain to him that I didn’t mean it, I only said that because I was angry at him. But as always with him, he removed my message and didn’t listen. He always takes things way to seriously, he even keeps going and lying to others users that I harassed him and not him. Because no matter what I do, he continues to blame me. The truth is that he’s the one that cannot accept the fact that he’s bulling and harassing users, he always acts like he did nothing wrong towards us, which the admins let him get away with. Even with Vincent D’Onofrio’s wife, he gave her a hard time on his article over his spouses and sources. I’ll post the link here very soon and you will see what I mean, it’s just crazy!ike I said before, he’s the one that won’t accept the criticism over his harassing.
Here’s the link:https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3lnt6j/vincent_donofrios_wife_has_tried_to_correct/. Sorry for taking so long to post this, I was busy.
P.S. Even though I no longer edit on there anymore, I still check back occasionally and see what’s been happening on there lately, ever since I stopped. I will keep updates by looking and I will add severes admins and users to the list on here of worst users everyone might encounter
I’m still in complete shock on how much support AndytheGrump has been getting, even on Wikipediocracy too, over his cyber bulling stuff and the why he treated me. You see, it shows you that some people on the internet have no sense of humor and have no common sense these day for supporting and defending bullies, saying that people are not in there right mind for doing it and supporting them. Even the admins on Wikipediocracy are horrible too, some of them sometimes make bad and horrible jokes about an old innocent user, for example when I talked about Sro23 on there. One of them make a joke about moving my post to a Spider-Man page and I didn’t get what he/she ment. And what do I get in return when I asked, an abusive reply. As usual, which I’m not suprised. Besides, there’s no need for Andy to make threats towards me when ever I post something new on there, telling me to “Get a life” and other abusing comments. I even said to him, “If you don’t like my posts, then don’t reply to them” because seriously, why would you have so much hate over a person you don’t even know! It’s just ridiculous! I was just only making a point, on how I’ve been treated on WP, Jesus…. have some common sense Andy. But of course, another user defended him and told me to “Shut Up!” and other stuff. So basically the truth about the Wikipediocracy site, is that it’s basically a website that tells people that it’s “OK” to bully someone, by making harassing comments towards them in their posts over which they didn’t do anything wrong, on there. Now I can’t log back on there because my account has been inactive now, but not Andy’s!!! It was because I cursed at him by accident when I was only telling him to give me a break, for threatening me. But still, screw that site, I’m glad I’m inactive on there now, because I’m done with it! Even the site too, period. The admins on there can go to hell, especially Andy and the other user that defend him. Done!
Seriously AndytheGrump, get a f***ing life for crying out loud! Don’t blame me to get a life, “YOU” get a life. Quit threatening and blaming people over your problems, people have the right to speak and say what about their personal opinions. You shouldn’t keep judging them over what they explain and give out their thoughts on Wikipediocracy, ok. Think about that.
Seriously AndytheGrump, get a f***ing life for crying out loud! Don’t blame me to get a life, “YOU” get a life. Quit threatening and blaming people over your problems, people have the right to speak and say what they want about their personal opinions. You shouldn’t keep judging them over what they explain and give out their thoughts on Wikipediocracy, ok. Think about that
Besides, your the one that cannot accept criticism, not me.
You too Ebyabe, especially here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Re:_Ronald_McDonald. You saying I admiring everything I do and I refer you guys being awful, no! I’m talk about the whole site in general. Especially what you write in your talk page/pics saying I refer everyone out there as idiots, no. I’m talking about the people that supports bullies, not everyone in the entire world. Seriously Ebyabe, keep you thoughts to yourself. Who do u have to make a big deal and spread out bunch of nonsense to users over what ever someone says about a single random user on there, ok… enough. Shut up and get a f***ing life for crying out loud! Leave people alone!
Also to JamesBWatson, here’s a little reminder on what I’m talking about on everyone talking about you, here:http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5869&p=123727, as you can see, you’ve been doing this to everyone else besides just me James. So quit your lying.
Besides, you even know me! So why would you have a lot of hatred of a person you don’t even know!
Besides, you don’t even know me! So why would you have a lot of hatred of a person you don’t even know!
Well, it’s been official for me. Since Sro23 became admin, I’m done! I’m not gonna touch another article on WP ever again. I even made it clear before when I said “If Sro23 ever becomes admin, I’m done!” But well… here it is. They made it official to him, even for all the support he’s been getting here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sro23#Congratulations!, which I’m not surprised at all. Well it’s our fault, we predicted the future. That only comes to one thing in our minds Conner… (face palm) ?
As you can see, they are still continuing to talk about me here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=849411076#Writings_from_blocked_range, in the “Writings from blocked range” section. You can see they are continuing to lie about me about what I ever did to them, they are saying I hacked several admin accounts that treated me badly, but they are so full of crap. Throughout my whole life on the Internet, I have never hacked anyone’s account in my whole life, not once, never. JamesBWatson needs to learn to be quiet and stop making up stuff, even for the way he treated me badly. It was several years ago, I may have hacked his account or I might have not, because I don’t remember that well because it’s been a couple years ago. They said they even know my identity by doing some research on me. But I don’t care, they are the ones that caused the harassment and bulling. Besides, there’s no need for them to research someone and stalk them into there privacy, no need for that. It should be illegal, people have there own privacy and there no red for someone to stalk them and continue to harass and lie about them over and over. I man just wow… a lot a people on the internet are jerks. Wish the internet was never like this, people should have some more sense of humor to themselves and not support bullies like AndytheGrump for example and Sro23. Still, they need to learn to leave inoccent people alone and stop searching their identitys for info, it’s there privacy. But… whatever… bad people don’t listen.
Second JamesBWatson, u accuse me of attacking admin accounts! No, it’s because I was only standing up for myself and u guys kept on treating me like crap! That’s the truth! Sorry JamesBWatson, no one is not gonna buy your story. I’ve seen others users talk about you on the Wikipediocracy.com site, even though I’m fine with that site.
As you can see, they are still continuing to talk about me here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=849411076#Writings_from_blocked_range, in the “Writings from blocked range” section. You can see they are continuing to lie about me about what I never did to them, they are saying I hacked several admin accounts that treated me badly, but they are so full of crap. Throughout my whole life on the Internet, I have never hacked anyone’s account in my whole life, not once, never. JamesBWatson needs to learn to be quiet and stop making up stuff, even for the way he treated me badly. It was several years ago, I may have hacked his account or I might have not, because I don’t remember that well because it’s been a couple years ago. They said they even know my identity by doing some research on me. But I don’t care, they are the ones that caused the harassment and bulling. Besides, there’s no need for them to research someone and stalk them into there privacy, no need for that. It should be illegal, people have there own privacy and there no need for someone to stalk them and continue to harass and lie about them over and over. I man just wow… a lot a people on the internet are jerks, people have no sense of humor there days. Wish the internet was never like this, people should have some more sense of humor to themselves and not support bullies like AndytheGrump for example and Sro23. Still, they need to learn to leave inoccent people alone and stop stalking and searching their identitys for info, it’s there privacy. It’s like they are treating me as a bad personal for searching about me online, but I’m not, and people need to learn to stop treating people like that. But… whatever… bad people don’t listen.
Besides, liars make me sick! And they don’t even know me! Like why you guys gave so much hatred of a person you don’t even know…
Besides, liars make me sick! And they don’t even know me! Like why you guys have so much hatred of a person you don’t even know…
Also two words, FlightTime sucks! End of story. All he does is make a big fuss out of every edit an ip user makes, and makes unnecessary threatens to them too!
Although that was all before in the past, when he gave me trouble. But like I sahe d before, I’m still not touching another WP article again, since Sro23 is admin now.
Welp, it’s official. Sro23 is now an admin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Sro23
They got 277 support votes and only 4 oppose votes. Simply ridiculous.
Crap… ?
The way I look at it, he’s definitely gonna receive a lot, I mean “A LOT” of hatred since he’s now an admin. I can picture him in my head when he blocks a bunch of IP’s. He gonna make the whole block extension for I would say about 3 to 5 years probably, since he’s bad. For example, Elockid blocked in original IP address for a total of 4 freaking years. It’s set to expire next month in August 2018, geeesh, about time. Also, if you look at his edit history, Elockid hasn’t been active on the wiki since July 2016, it’s kinda looks like he’s retired from the wiki, not quite sure though. But boy, this is gonna be a one tough admin to deal with. My best regrets is to stay off to avoid him, that’s my best advice. Besides, like I said in my previous comment, Wikipedia’s info can’t be trusted anyways. They also update their articles everyday and they always constantly delete sourced information all the time in their articles. They will always make up a bunch of BS excuses too, when ever you trie to restore it back and they remove it again. Like for example when they gave me a hard time on the Ronald McDonald article. I can explain the whole thing, but that will take forever, go click on the edit history on the article and see for yourself, you’ll see what I mean.
Sorry, i meant to say “They always update” not “They also update
Still, what the hell were they thinking!?!?!? Tells you that people have no common sense of humor in themselves.
P.S. Also I forgot to mention, don’t join wikipediocracy.com, I’m now regretting it on joining the site, it’s full of jerks. Such as selfish jerks like AndytheGrump and Anroth too. They’ve been picking me apart and calling me a complainer, lesson learned for me, never join a site that harasses innocent people.
Come to think of it, this site is even worse than Wikipedia! But now from all that BS AndytheGrump put me through, I’m done! Besides, he doesn’t even know me! So there’s no need for him to say threatening comments about me. Still, screw this site Wikipediocracy.comhttp://wikipediocracy.com/forum/index.php, and all the bad admins on there too. They do nothing anyways, all they do is make fun of users, like me for example. I’m not surprised that some of them sided with Andy anyways. AndytheGrump is an jerk He’s the one that needs to get a life, not me! Screw Andy, he can go to hell!
I was gonna post one final reply to him, but I though forget it, he’s not gonna listen anyways., I was gonna write “Dude, you don’t even know me!” But boy, he really “IS” a Grump… even by his user name. But whatever, I’m done with wikipediocracy.com. Andy can say whatever he wants about me, I don’t even care. He’s a jerk anyways and thank god no one has to put with him on WP, since now he’s retired from the site.
Also, screw admin Midsize Jake for making fun of my comments I posted twice by accident, when someone makes a mistake with their comments posting, there’s no need for an admin to make fun of it and say they will delete both of them, seriously, what an idiot! Still, I’m done with that site.
But besides, I made it clear before when I said if Sro23 ever becomes admin, I’m done! But well… here it is, it happened. We predict the future…
As you can see, they are still continuing to talk about me here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=849411076#Writings_from_blocked_range, in the “Writings from blocked range” section. You can see they are continuing to lie about me about what I ever did to them, they are saying I hacked several admin accounts that treated me badly, but they are so full of crap. Throughout my whole life on the Internet, I have never hacked anyone’s account in my whole life, not once, never. JamesBWatson needs to learn to shut up, even for the way he treated me badly. They said they even know my identity by doing some research on me. But I don’t care, they are the ones that caused the harassment and bulling. Besides, there’s no need for them to research someone and stalk them into there privacy, no need for that. It should be illegal, people have there own privacy and there no red for someone to stalk them and continue to harass and lie about them over and over. I man just wow… a lot a people on the internet are jerks. Wish the internet was never like this, people should have some more sense of humor to themselves and not support bullies like AndytheGrump for example and Sro23. But… whatever…
One more thing I wanna say here before these comments section gets closed too. Is that farther more, Wikipedia’s info can never be trusted. People our there if you read this message of mine, please do yourself a favor and do your own research. Never use Wikipedia as a reliable search site for info for school work and other things, I’m not telling you guys this to be bad towards you guys, I’m telling you all this for your safety and stuff. For example, if you need help getting treated with medicine if your really sick with the flu or other, like I said, use a dictionary to help with your treatment, not Wikipedia. Because if you read it, sometimes their info that talks about the treatmeant might and will always be wrong. Like I said, stick with the dictionary. Besides, on Wikipedia, they always update their articles all the time and delete a lot of stuff constantly from articles that are relatable sourced and stuff. Like I said before, the site is absolutely no good and can’t be trusted with its info. Use a dictionary for research and stuff, that will help you a lot more than Wikipedia. Respect that my friends! Do it for your own good. ?
One more thing I wanna say here before these comments section gets closed too. Is that farther more, Wikipedia’s info can never be trusted. People our there if you read this message of mine, please do yourself a favor and do your own research. Never use Wikipedia as a reliable search site for info for school work and other things, I’m not telling you guys this to be bad ties you guys, I’m telling you all this for your safety and stuff. Besides, they always update their articles all the time and delete a lot of stuff constantly from articles that are relatable sourced and stuff. Like I said before, the site is absolutely no good and can’t be trusted with its info. Use a dictionary for research and stuff, that will help you a lot more than Wikipedia. Respect that my friends! Do it for your own good. ?
OMG Ebyabe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ebyabe#Bsak_again, give me a f***ing break! You revert other peoples edit too, don’t give me that bullcrap! Like you did to Vincent D’Onofrio’s wife!
Hahaha, guess what take a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ronald_McDonald&diff=849408816&oldid=849407248, I had a feeling that he was gonna log out of his account and remove it again. He just did that just to avoid getting harassed, just like what “Conner” told me.
But still, I should have kept my fingers off the Ronald McDonald article in the first place, and this whole joe maggard not being Ronald McDonald removal crap would have never started, because of Hollaballo. Still now that I think about it when I added some additional info about maggard, Holla probably thought to himself when I added it: “You know, I’m just gonna remove all this info just to anger you!” Just like that. I know how people are…
Were here’s a big surprise from Hullaballoo’s report: “An IP-hopping editor is insistent on keeping information about a guy who’s pretended be a Ronald McDonald portrayer into this article, even though multiple PC reviewers, including ”moi”, have determined it should be removed. A bio article on the guy has also been deleted at least twice. (There are also BLP issues about publicizing, directly or indirectly, the criminal record of a non-notable person). The IP-hopper has now announced they’re going to keep adding the information no matter how many times it’s removed, and has certainly violated 3RR. Checking back through the contribution histories, this editor concentrates on a relatively small number of articles, mostly dealing with minor performers and voice actors, as well as dhowing a minor fascination with dash issues, and enough overlap in targets with [[Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/MascotGuy|a certain long-term abuser]]. Perhaps someone more familiar than me with the LTA could take a look at this; I can’t tell whether this is a returning vandal or just a run-of-the-mill clown.”
Ok first off Hulla, your the one that started the vandalism wars, not me. Take out your anger on someones else besides me, your the one that’s the jerk. Give me a break you idiot!
Besides, I was only preventing information from being removed by vandalism people, like you for example. P.S. This is not a harassment threat I’m saying, I’m just saying you need to stop. Give me a break you f***ing idiot!
Besides, I was only preventing information from being removed by vandalism people, like you for example Hulla. P.S. This is not a harassment threat I’m saying, I’m just saying you need to stop. Give me a break you f***ing idiot!
P.S. Ya sorry, I forgot to put his user name in my previous one I posted. It was meant for user Hullaballoo
Well I learn my lesson, never write on here of an article your editing currently. Because “Mr. you know who” is watching this as usual and will revert any article you mention here. Lesson learned myself, like alway’s… Wikipedia is absolutely no good!
Still, that was just a one time only I edited the wiki. Ebyabe needs to learn to give me a break
Once again, Ebyabe should not have stuck his nose were it didn’t belong! The argument between me and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz had nothing to do with him. But once again, he gets involved…
And this my friends, this is the reason why Wikipedia is absolutely no good! Like I said before, they don’t give a dam about the way they treat their users, as always! And as always, they never take their time to fix their info that’s not true, when ever an IP adds incorrect and not true info in different articles. Since they don’t do it, another IP has to do it. But once that happens, an admin will accuse you for being a jerk and for vandalism which you never did, as always. They need to learn to be more mature and do the right thing and help people!
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz is a freaking tool now too! Removing info from the Ronald McDonald article were I clearly explained and told him numerous times to stop with th reverts. He even told me some bull crap that’s not important either, he’s just removing the info on purpose just to anger me on purpose. Seriously Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, give me a break!
hey Anthony, you seems really hit. Please receive my sympathy empathy whatever, I not the master in leaving things behind but it says that is a good thing.
How about the social media managers, whom are paid people to influence the public ? Would you think they would not interfere with Wikipedia just for the sake of a noble idea ?
I have just cheeked on Indeed, right now at the hour I am writing the reply, and I got 1,024 jobs as Social Media Manager in a 3 mil. people city.
Social media is doomed…
Thanks man, for the support. It really means a lot! ?
Do u wanna know who else is annoying, freaking Geraldo Perez of course. No matter how much evidence you provided to him and prove that your right with the sources you find, he’ll just revert it and don’t even care.
And when you tel him it’s not unsourced, he still won’t believe you…
He also admitted on his user page that he has an Admin account and only use this one to (let me guess) vandalize. So basically, his Geraldo Perez user account is basically a sock puppet account. Seriously, what a tool! ?
Another thing I forgot to mention. Once this comment section gets closed down, Ebyabe won’t be watching this anymore when it gets closed. All I can say is once that happens, thank god!
@Conner
Also Conner, if you look here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ebyabe/talkpagepics, you can see at the bottom that he wrote a whole bunch of stuff just to mock me. If you go click on the page history, I actually did try to delete the threatening comments he wrote about, but at the end I restored it back. The reason why I did is because it’s his page not mine, i also know he’s gonna have it protected “Again” as usual like he does to his talk pages and other articles. I even said to myself after I restored it “You know, I’m not even gonna bother with this, it’s his page not mine, and he can write what ever he wants about me. I can tell people what to do and what not to do with their pages.” So ya like I said, he can write what ever he wants about me, they are all just a bunch of lies he’s saying and no one is not gonna buy it at all. They are just gonna roll their eyes and ignore it like I do. I don’t care if he has it protected or not, but it’s his page, not mine.
P.S. Most of all, he’s never gonna stop updating on his talk page over what I keep posting on here, lol.
Also, there’s this unknown IP user out there that editing all the Thomas and Friends related articles on there and he’s blaming that IP user for being controlled by me. I looked at the edit history on all of them Thomas related articles and I had nothing to do with them, whoever is using that IP address is probably impersonating me, because I have never use that single IP address that edited those Thomas articles before ever.
As usual, he’s gonna get User:IJBall to turn against me as usual. As soon as Ebyabe replies to him, he’s gonna give away my username from the other wikis I’m on currently, not wikipedia I mean. First off, there’s a person you don’t even know, you don’t give away their personal info, it’s private, he should know better than that. But IJBall asked anyways, Ebyabe still hasn’t replied yet.
@Conner
By the way Conner, I even thought to myself the same thing as I said about Homechallange55 having a lot of hate on me. As for Ebyabe, I said the same thing to myself “Why would you say and mention lies of a lot of hate over a person you don’t even know…” But whatever, like I said, he can say what ever he wants about me.
Even though I said I’m no longer active on there permanently. I know that the damage has already been done here on his Commons talk page; https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ebyabe#/talk/1, I posted to him back in 2016 about suing him and stuff. But like I said before and I’ll say it again, I didn’t even mean it at all, I only said all that because I was just angry. But I will regret it for writing all that to him. Even though it’s “HIS” talk page and he can do what he chants with it, I don’t care if he doesn’t believe me at all about when it posted all that to him back in 2016 about suing him. I even explained to him that I didn’t even mean it at all, but until he told me to not write on there anymore on his Commons talk page, he still didn’t even believe me. But he’s right, it “IS” his talk page and he can do what he wants with it, besides he has it protected until September 2018. Even though I still can’t get him to believe me for what I said, I’m not even gonna bother with him on his wiki Commons talk page anymore, I really mean it this time, I will not post there anymore starting this year. It’s best to leave him alone and move on, I don’t care if he keeps laying about me over and over, because like I said, he can do what he wants because it “HIS” talk page. It’s best not to take it to far.
P.S. Besides, he doesn’t even know me.
Still, Ebyabe and Sro23 can say what ever lies they want about me, it’s there talk pages, not mine. I’m not even gonna bother on spamming his and Sro’s talk pages over and over again, they didn’t even know me. Who cares what he says, I’m permanently done for good this time on Wikipedia, I will never click on and edit any article ever again on there.
Especially that nut case Homechallenge55. Blaming people over his issues, even when me blamed me of having issues (In which I don’t in real life), all I thought to myself was “Dude… why would you have so much hatred for a person you don’t even know…” because he’s the one that has issues. But whatever, Homechallange55 can do what he wants and lie many times he wants, it doesn’t even bother me. ?
You know Ebyabe, for what you just said here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ebyabe/talkpagepics&diff=830833432&oldid=830400475. I can talk about you as many times as I want, there’s no law that says we can’t talk about what ever we want in this world. People can say what they want, you can’t control them. I don’t even care what you keeping saying or updating things, who gives a crap. It’s fine, keep playing the victim all you want. Besides, everyone out there is not gonna put up with your crap with all the bad and horrible stuff you keep posting, and they will not be by your side anymore if you keep doing this. Just saying, if you keep this up with the bad things, people are gonna turn away from you and not support you for all the stuff you do. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
He even told me on the 191.101.30.254 address a while back. he told be to just go back to the Disney Wiki and keep adding various edits as much as I desire. But you know what, I’ll gladly do that then, in which I’m still doing. So I would have to put up with him anymore.
Look at this:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sro23&diff=830167792&oldid=830137909, again with the lies from Ebyabe. Blaming me of harassing him on the Commons Wiki, take a look here for yourself:https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ebyabe&diff=291984548&oldid=291979309 and here:https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ebyabe&diff=291997863&oldid=291995926. Does it look like I harassed him at all?, No. This is exactly what I’m talking about that he won’t take any criticism. He’s still playing the victim acting like he didi nothing wrong, he’s nothing but a liar. But it’s ok, like I said he can lie about me al he wants, because what he says about me is not true. Besides, Conner and Matthew Flores agree with me and are on my side. They went though the same situations too, like I said before and I’ll say it again. It’s best to move on and ignore it, that’s the very last time I will post on his Wiki Commons talk page, I wasn’t even spamming it at all too. But whatever, time to move on! ?
P.S. Besides, Ebyabe doesn’t even know me. In real life.
Hey Anthony, thanks for the notification on my talkpage. For whatever reason I just now saw it today even though it was posted a couple days ago. I saw that Sro23 was mentioned on here, yet again. He just can’t seem to keep himself out of other people’s business. It’s like he actually looks for trouble on Wikipedia and then proceeds to further instigate it.
Well guess what? He’s likely going to become an admin soon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll/Archive_10#Sro23:_February_13,_2018
And of course, as expected, he has all of the support from his many followers, lol.
The day that Sro23 becomes an admin is the day that I officially stop editing Wikipedia for good. I still can’t get over the fact that he somehow found an account of mine that I don’t even use on the main English Wikipedia: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Conkird
Also, I’m pretty sure that Widr has just completely given up on blocking my IP addresses. He still stalks all of my edits and reverts them on-sight but he doesn’t even block my IP addresses anymore. The last IP address of mine that he blocked was 198.236.58.11 which he blocked for six months back in October, and it belongs to the college that I go to. Luckily that block expires in about a month from now…
What!?!?!? Are you seriously!?!?!? Omg… what are they thinking for making him into one!?!? In my opinion, I think he’s a terrible choice to become an admin. Seriously, what is go through there minds for planning on making him into an admin soon. I still can’t even picture it already, on how he’s gonna be like when he becomes one. He’s gonna be physically abusing his power against everyone he edits towards whoever, it’s gonna be out of control with him. I’m with you as well, I will not touch a single article ever again when he becomes one in the future. Especially Ebyabe too, if you already saw the links I posted above, over what he keeps on doing to me. Making abusive jokes.
P.S. By the way, if you don’t know this already. Ebyabe is actually watching us for what ever we post on here, in which it’s basically stalking. I know… it’s creepy. He can’t even learn to mind his own business, he doesn’t need to know everything we post/write on here. What he’s doing right now is basically stalking us and keeping an eye on all of us for everything we talk about here. He even stalked and fallowed me here to this blog I created of Sro23:http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=8988&sid=8d54b83cdc19e058ff3a411612ec0cdd. he basically joined just to annoy me, he replied “What Anthony fails to mention is his harassment of users on other sites like Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage and the TARDIS wikia, myself being one of those so harassed. Anthony has been editing on Wikipedia since February of 2012. He was blocked in December 2013 and has been sockpuppeting ever since. He has been told ad nauseum what to do and not to do. Either he is choosing to ignore that or is incapable of understanding. It’s like he has a hammer and everyone is telling him, “Don’t hit yourself with the hammer, you can hurt yourself.” His response is essentially, “Oh yeah, I’ll show them!” and then proceeds to hit himself repeatedly, followed by blaming everyone else for the injuries. Moving on would entail not editing on Wikipedia anymore. But sadly, past behavior indicates this is unlikely. So I’ll say it again. Stop hitting yourself with the hammer.” I mean, seriously… he just wrote all that just to get people to turn against me and “AGAIN” play the victim, what he wrote on there was basically an abusive threat. First off I said it before and I’ll say it again, I didn’t harass him, he harassed me. I only went on the Commons Wiki and the TARDIS Wiki just to tell him to stop with his bad behavior, I never threaten him at all or blame anyone at all on there, I even never said any death threats to him at all either. I was only standing up for myself against him, because I know violence is not the answer too. But seriously, he needs to stop playing the victim and just confess for what he’s been doing to us and everyone else. I just don’t understand why the admins themself’s don’t even see the bad things he’s been doing to us and everyone else, I mean seriously… are the admins blind? I mean come on, are they seriously “THAT” lazy?!?!? Like I said before in my previous comments, if I was an admin, I would immediately put my foot down and do the right thing and ban the bad users, that’s it. But he really needs to stop stalking/watching us and stop posting updates on his talk page over what ever we keep writing on here. It’s really creepy, but just ignore him and don’t read what he says on his talk pages.
For you information Conner on what I’m talking about him stalking/watching us, look at what he just wrote here on Sro23’s talk page:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sro23&diff=prev&oldid=831995585. He’s wishing him luck on being a great admin on Wikipedia. First off, why am I not surprised…. sigh…. whatever Ebyabe.
Another thing I’m glad is that mr. idiot nut case Homechallenge55 left me alone, that’s a nick name I call him, because he really is a nut case. As I showed before, here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2600:1000:B03B:30F9:D9C5:51AC:1BF2:2543, if you read it, he actually blamed me for having mental illness in real life over my editing and crap… I was like thinking to myself after he wrote that “Dude are you seriously… you don’t even know me….” I just rolled my eyes after me posted that. For someone to write angry messages like that, (if you saw in the link I posted.) and says stuff like that, means that they are crazy people and he’s one of them. Blaming someone for having mental illness is a stupid thing to say, seriously… Homechallenge55 is f***ed up in the head. He just gets angry at people when ever things don’t go his way, acts like he knows everything. ?
Also, the reason why I made all of Homechallenge55’s comments on private, is because I couldn’t delete his threatening comments when I use to use that IP address. When ever I try to delete them, it keeps giving me this message in a red box, saying it has been disallowed over an issue and other stuff. It means that the page was disabled for me to delete messages, which is bull crap. When someone sending you a threatening messages, you have the right to delete it.
Also, here’s a little update for what he just wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ebyabe/talkpagepics&diff=830133188&oldid=818562367. He posted this just to mock me, but who cares, I’m not mad at all. Because the reason is I’ve just recently commented on his talk page on Wiki Commons and I was only telling about that comment I posted there back in 2016 about suing him was just a joke. I said it because I was only testing him to see his reaction, not harassment. He even asked to reply to him only on his Wikipedia talk page, but guess what, I’m not going too. I’ve been done for several months already, so who cares. Even though I’m finished with that said, Ebyabe can go to hell anyways, he can say what ever he wants about me, it’s his talk page. I don’t care if he lies about me or not, because what he says about me is not true, he’s the one that caused it anyways. Just like he did to *cough* Vincent D’Onofrio’s wife *cough*. It’s best to move on and ignore it, he’s an idiot anyways. Who cares what he says! ?
P.S. Bullies need to learn to clean up there act. ?
I just showed my mom Ebyabe’s user/talk page and showed her that he called us “Idiots” and “morons”. Even my mom said he’s an idiot, as well for posting all that for what he said. Well no matter what, I’m preeminently done for good this time. I’m not gonna let them get all over me anymore, Ebyabe can lie about me all he want’s and blame the stress on me, in which case he’s the one that caused it against me, making me all stressed out and angry. I’m just gonna keep my focus on the fan site Disney Wiki and others, I have better things to do than to put up with him and all of them admins on Wikipedia. Disney Wiki admins are more respectful and better than that site, It’s best to just ignore them and move on. 😉
Another important lesson I learned is that when ever there’s a user/admin you don’t like and that’s harassing you, never spam their talk pages. Because it will only make things worse for you, I admit it that I did it to Ebyabe on Commons Wiki and on the Tardis Wiki too, but still now I’m gonna regret it for doing it and I learned my lesson to never do that again. Besides, the admin on the Tardis Wiki would listen to me, I knew she (Shambala108) was gonna defend him and be by his side, not surprised. I’m actually glad I’m ban from that site, I didn’t wanna be part of it anyways so I wouldn’t have to put up with bad users like him and her. I also realized that Ebyabe also has an account on the Disney Wiki too, but you know what, I’m not even gonna bother with him on there, I’m not even gonna go and spam his talk page on there like I did on the Tardis Wiki by mistake. Besides, I have better things to do than to put up with him. If he messages me on my talk page on the Disney Wiki, I’ll just delete it, ignore him and move on. Because I’m not even gonna listen too him and to any of his lies. Like I said, Disney Wiki has been so good to me for the past 4 years I’ve been on there and I never picked on or harassed anyone on there at all. They are good to me and I’m good to them back. ?
P.S. Even though she (Shambala108) wouldn’t listen to me on the Tardis Wiki, she can defend him all she wants, I don’t even care. Even no matter what wiki he’s on. As long as I leave him (Ebyabe) alone, he’ll leave me alone. That’s all it matters, it’s best to just move on. ?
I just noticed that part 2 of this blog got closed now too. Liu I’m sorry, please don’t close this one too. But I swear, I’m not trying to spam all of them. I didn’t mean to post once and twice, it’s because I kept on making typos in my comments by mistake. My phone does it and that’s why I kept on post repeats of the same comments. Because I keep making typos and my phone corrects my words by mistake. Please don’t close this one, please.
I just wish the admins would do the right thing and ban all the cyber bullies that harrased us and everyone else out there, not us. They shouldn’t be supporting bullies.
I had been contributing on Wikipedia in several languages for nearly or more than 10 years, and was just blocked. Phew, I should take this as a chance to get away from this world.
Especially Sro23, he’s the worst!
Here’s another incident on what happen to me this past May 2017, I requested Racharl Lillis’ years active to be added in the article on here talk page:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rachael_Lillis&action=history, but as always, (Mr. won’t take criticism) Sro23, denied my request and told me to “Go Home!”, because he’s ben giving trouble for the longest time, Ebyabe also got involved and Ponyo (sock puppet of BMK) also refused and protected the talk page, be I removed Sro23’s harassment comment and other stuff. I’m afraid if I repost the request again, I’ll get more trouble from them again. But who cares, they are just bully losers with no lives and with waaaaaay too much time in their hands… ?
I have come across a similar problem in the recent past, only this is in regards to a Wikia fansite rather than the actual Wikipedia. They’re pretty much the same breed, just as arrogant and just as nauseating.
Check this moron out for example
http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/User:Gonzalo84?useskin=oasis
Need I say anything more?
I also had a trouble with an admin there (different one from Gonzalo84), and I was forever blocked.
Here’s another incident on what happen to me this past May 2017, I requested Racharl Lillis’ years active to be added in the article on here talk page:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rachael_Lillis&action=history, but as always, (Mr. won’t take criticism) Sro23, denied my request and told me to “Go Home!”, because he’s ben giving trouble for the longest time, Ebyabe also got involved and Ponyo (sock puppet of BMK) also refused and protected the talk page, be I removed Sro23’s harassment comment and other stuff. I’m afraid if I repost the request again, I’ll get more trouble from them again. But who cares, they are just bully losers with no lives and with waaaaaay too much time in their hands… ?
Hey: i know this is super late too, but i wanted to let you know how your attitude, humor and valid points helped to assuage the major trauma associated with recently being completely severed from Wikipedia in truly vindictive style. While I agree that bad admins/editors should face justice, i won’t use any names in case they could link back to me, i deserve my privacy if they do. Anyways i tried to fix one tiny (and kinda racist) article, and that’s when a longtime editor literally shouted “hey! I need some muscle over here!” in the talk comments. Naturally i was freaked out, being a newbie to the extreme who just wanted to help. Just two days later i was completely forbidden from ever editing again or creating a clean account for an “indefinite period” due to falsified claims of “persistent vandalism” followed by totally unmerited “sockpuppet investigations”, just because a few people had DARED to speak up for me on the talk page (oh, karma police! Arrest me! Arrest this girl!!), all by, get this, some douchebag editor who LITERALLY claims on his own user page that he is an admin using a completely separate account for “security concerns”, although he will talk about his true identity only to “other admins”. Like, wtf? So admins can be abusive and have all the sock puppets they want, and yet they go about accusing others of the same behavior, even if it’s totally untrue as well as definitely unproven, and get them instantly banned? “Ignore All Rules” sure is convenient! However, lastly i just wanna say not all admins are such conscious a**holes: i read one awesome admin’s comments bemoaning his fellow bureaucrats’ own depravities, saying: “if Wikipedia dies, it will be because an influential faction, and close to a consensus, has decided that experienced Wikipedians don’t need to be as civil as newcomers. What’s worse, is that so many otherwise respectable Wikipedians are pretending that we have the opposite problem, which makes a constructive discussion impossible, as well as making it hard to believe them about anything else.” AMEN TO THAT MAN, if you ask me more mature admins/editors like THIS dude with clearly identifiable user pages should be congratulated and promoted in some way, and the real problem is with young little sniveling cowards who feel like gods hiding behind their despicable sock puppetry and lack of ways to communicate with them directly. But just my two cents, thanks again, have a good day y’all
Agree. These posts help me to ease my feelings. There should have been problems with me, but the admins can destroy the primal objective of Wikipedia.
@Dory
No worries Dory, I’m with you too. My best advice is to just stay off of there and ignore them permanently. That’s what I do.
Sorry ignore the typos again, in meant to say “them” not “you”
I’m really late commenting on this haha, but the administrator emotionallama is a complete c**t (excuse the language). I was editing a few articles about the band Underworld because they were incorrect and needed changing to avoid being misleading. Anyway, while I’m correcting away I get a truckload of notifications from them saying that I was apparently trying to change stuff that was factual (it was in regards to their discography), I’m sorry but as someone who has followed Karl Hyde and Rick Smith’s music religiously I think I know their history much better than some low life who sits in their chair distorting articles under the guise of ‘admin’ and deletes edits or even bans editors they don’t like. If they message me again in the next hour or two I’m going to tell them to get f**ked, then I’ll stop editing (they’ll most likely run of crying that I’ve been “disruptive” and try to get me banned haha).
I just edited on an article on Macau that fixed a tiny error, and yet here a few days later I get a message from a crazy admin that it’s not allowed and he deleted my correction. I did a lot on Chinese articles and these idiot admins who have 0 knowledge of Chinese deletes it! There’s many more. There’s so many errors with so many articles that these admins think their edition is 100% correct but isn’t. Full of crazy minor and major errors, language-wise, grammar-wise or otherwise. Get rid of Wikipedia, and put a up a better version to it where corrections and fixes are allowed, instead of being deleted just because an admins hates it even when it’s correct.
I feel your pain man, just to warn you. Sro23 is the worst of them all, I talked about him numerous times on Geoffrey Liu’s “Why i really Hate Wiki Admins” previous blogs. But my best advice for you is ignore them and move on, that’s what I do. Because violence is not the answer.
They moderators Dharmadhyaksha and spacemanspiff are idiots. I have created an article of “Rakshit Tandon” a cyber security expert whose profile is verified by Facebook. Still these idiots think that the person is not notable who have speaken for united nation and european commission. Search and found more than 1000s of articles on him. They first deleted one article and after something deleted my another article blaming of conflict of interest. If i have expertise in cyber field, will i be suitable for writing about nano technology. . Belive me they are idiots and i speciallly thanks you for writing such a great article.
That’s what hate too, I hate those kind of people that takes the blame on another person that they never did and they get away with it, especially Sro23 and Ebyabe. I feel you man!
Wikipedia admins need to be stopped. There harassment bulling has gone to far, just look at the way they treated me. I’m also an innocent user too.
I know I’m late replying lol, but I totally agree with you, like I said in my comment I think, as a diehard fan of Underworld I think I know a heck of a lot more than low-life, bullying scum like emotionallama (the name is probably a reference to their constant anger at anyone who corrects the blatant mistakes on their articles) when it comes to their history, what is “factual” and what they have and haven’t done. That Spamhater guy sounds like a right twat as well. Sorry for the bad language haha, but that idiot administrator has seriously pissed me off.
But it’s ok, I doesn’t matter if your late at replying. Besides, they have so much wrong information on some of there articles and the admins don’t do nothing about it, they never fix them right away. They take there sweet little time getting through situations of their’s. They have a mind of there own. Those idiots!
I forgot to add, the media organisation I work for, which is one of the largest in the world, bans Wikipedia because of its ‘total unreliablility and untrustworthiness’. It’s also increasingly manipulated by big corporations with the time and resource to monitor and change pages. A great idea but one doomed to fail by its own success.
It’s the arrogance and rudeness of these self-appointed traffic wardens that is irritating. I have found one = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RHaworth – who delighted in deleting articles and just firing off rude replies because his own life is clearly so bloody inadequate. Just look at the picture of the troll on his page and you will see why he finds his thrills on Wikipedia.
I have just fallen foul of RHaworth myself. Was in the process of creating my first article about a musician. I created in my own user space, and did not publish as it was by no means finished.
The help text tells you this is a safe space and articles here will not be reviewed.
Within hours RHaworth had deleted it!
This bloke is seriously annoying.
Wikipedia is going to die if new contributors are treated like this.
Bravo… a wonderful piece. I attempted to write a page for Wiki on, you guessed it, a subject that I am very much involved with. I remained neutral and cited source upon source only to have a moderator delete it. I enjoyed Wiki, just hate the moderators.
Wikipedia can’t work in its current incarnation, that’s for sure. It will crumble some day.
“It will crumble someday”
I can hardly wait…
Congratulations! You submitted the 100th comment! (NO this is not spam). Would you like to be featured on this blog?
Oh lucky me!
Sure, What do you mean by “featured”
Sorry about the late reply, but featured = blog post about you, your website, whatever you want (no spam of course). So reply back and tell me what you want featured about you. A short bio, perhaps?
Sorry for my late reply. I am interested, how exactly would I give you this information?
name, short biography, your website, your website’s cause. I will feature you once you provide me this info.
Just to give you a heads up Liu. A user named Ebyabe has stollen and taken the link of your blogs “Why I Really Hate Wiki Admins” and is using them as a reference for himself on his talk page of how bad he is, he directly stole it and he didn’t even ask your permission of it, right here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ebyabe. You have to report this about him.
I’m not trying to make this into a big deal for you. I respect you and everything, what I’m saying is that he (Ebyabe) shouldn’t be stealing links to people’s blogs and use them for themselves. It’s not my fault that he did it, it’s just that he just wouldn’t get off my case and stop following me to what ever blog or website I go too.
This is the conversation I recently had with an admin after I was perma-blocked as a sockpuppet (I was in an edit war with an admin who then made a sockpuppet complaint against me – which was upheld by another admin – on the basis that [1] check-user showed I lived in the same city of 3.3 million people (no IP match was found) as someone he had had banned six months previously, and [2] I displayed ‘behavioral similarities’ to that person because I spelled his name incorrectly and the other user had spelled his name incorrectly, too (he went on to note that, actually, many people spelled his name incorrectly but – when taken with ‘evidence’ point 1 was ‘proof’).
Anywho, I complained to another admin and it ended something like this (details of the situation background are deleted for brevity:
—Summary of Previous Emails—
I had complained to “ADMIN X” about “ADMIN Y” who had filed the complaint against me that led to my perma-block on the basis that said admin was “defending” an obscure article about a local radio host whose fan club he was a member of; filing frivolous noticeboard actions against anyone who tried to edit it.
—Reply from “ADMIN X”—
From: XXX@XXX.com
Subject: Re: Wikipedia e-mail
To: XXXX@XXX.com
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 5:51 PM
Wikipedia has a ‘NO OWNERSHIP’ guideline in regards to articles. No one has ownership over an article. If you cite your contributions correctly then it can’t be removed.
—My Reply—
Unfortunately a guideline is only meaningful if the people with the power to enforce it choose to do so. Otherwise it’s just words on paper.
Thanks for your time,
—Reply Back to Me From Admin X—
Actually it’s policy. Thanks. Have a nice evening.
—My Reply—
“Breaking the law is illegal, therefore, no one has ever broken the law.”
“Violating wikipedia policy is against policy, therefore, the policy has never been violated.”
That definitely made my night – you have a nice evening, too!
—Next—
At this point “Admin X” trumped my perma-block by further blocking me from editing my talk page, thereby preventing my from placing an unblock request.
SRSLY, what rocks do they find these people under? It’s like I was dealing with someone with a GED.
That’s the problem with Wikipedia now these days. They never cared about their users that edit on there, they only protect themselves.
Agree with Eric, I like the idea of Wikipedia, but the way the admins are it doesn’t work.
I see something that’s not there and want to add it, it gets vandalized by an admin. Some Wiki that is, Wikipedia in theory: Improve the page and add info; Wikipedia in reality: Delete the page and have missing info.
Right about that!, they only do it just to protect themselves and no one else. That’s all they care about.
wikipedia administrators really ruin what is otherwise a really nice idea. they are fascists, and they definitely do have too much time on their hands. also, most of them are braindead.
Another reason why they ban editors is they do it just to protect themselves. They never care about anyone on there no matter what we do to help, especially if you get bullied and harassed by someone on there. They don’t care if you report a user that’s harassing you, they will still ban you no matter what, even if your in the right and telling the truth. Like I said before, they do it just to protect themselves. I can name several admins and users that protect themselves on there, but that will take forever for me to add on here. But it’s ok, what’s said has been said, the truth.
P.S. But still, at least fan site wikis are never like that to us.
There’s this new user named AJFU who is being completely stubborn over the Mike MacRae article info, keeps on deleting the info of him voicing Buzz Lightyear, here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mike_MacRae. Complaining that the info is being “quote” on “quote” spread all over IMDb, Behind the Voice Actors and this and that, which is completely not. He’s the one that’s in the wrong, especially making up a whole bunch of nonsense about the info of it on IMDb and BTVA.com, I don’t know who this guy is, but he’s one of the most stubborn users I’ve seen yet. He doesn’t believe any info he sees and researches about who they voiced, he needs to go guesswork himself. And needs to stop making up a bunch of nonsense about those sites.